ЗЕМЛЯ TRE. № 5. 2020 г.

water, that is why it was not identified earlier. Detection was made possible due to the extremely low lake level in Sep­ tember 2019. No analogues of this carving at Kanozero have been identified. Some conclusions Despite the significant survey o f the rock outcrops o f the Kanozero islands, the identification of new petroglyphic pan­ els was possible for several reasons. Among them: 1) a drop in the water level in the lake, 2) the use o f photogrammetry and night photography. Discovered panels of petroglyphs have analogues among previously known. Altitudinal data on the location of petroglyphs groups can be useful in build­ ing the relative chronology and periodization of petroglyphs. The highest panel at the moment, Kamenniy 8 (18 m), has analogues in motives with a relatively low located rock panel Odinokaya (height 1-1.5 m). Motives of boats and marine hunting compositions o f the Eloviy 7 panel (0.3-0.5) also have analogues at the panel on different heights (the Ka­ menniy 1 panel is above 4 m, the Kamenniy 7 panel is above 8 m). Observation data indicate that stylistically close petro­ glyphs were made at altitudes in very wide ranges - from 0 to 8 m and from 1.5 to 18 m. Рис. 20. Вид на скалу с группой Е7 со скалы группы Е4. 2018 г. Фото: В. Лихачев. Fig. 20. View of the cliff with panel E7 from the cliff of panel E4. 2018 Photo: V. Likhachev. Рис. 21. Петроглифы группы E7. Прорисовка на скриншоте с 30-модели 1) с текстурой 2) без текстуры. Обработка В. Лихачева. Fig. 21. Petroglyphs of panel E7. Drawing on a screenshot from a 3D- model 1) with a texture 2) without a texture. Illustration: V. Likhachev. 2020 TRE 61