Труды КНЦ (Технические науки) 2/2022(13).

33. Гладкий Ю. Н., Петров А. Н. Гуманитарная география: понятийный статус и самоидентификация // Известия РАН. Сер. геогр. 2008. № 3. С. 15-25. 34. Mitin I. I. Mental maps as an instrument of complex cultural geographical research: the analysis of approaches // Geographical Bulletin. 2018. № 4 (47). P. 21-33. 35. Kitchin R. M. Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1995. Vol. 14. P. 1-19. 36. Pocock D. Some characteristics of mental maps: an empirical study // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 1976. Vol. 1. P. 493-512. 37. Waterman S., Gordon D. A Quantitative-comparative Approach to Analysis of Distortion in Mental Maps // Professional Geographer. 1984. Vol. 36 (3). P. 326-337. 38. Тимофеева Т. Н. Когнитивные карты города Кяхта // Культурная и гуманитарная география. 2013. Т. 2, № 1. С. 53-64. 39. Коваленко И. М. Ментальные карты административного устройства Украины и Крыма (по пространственным знаниям жителей г. Симферополя) // Записки общества геоэкологов. 2000. Вып. 3. С. 23-30. 40. Hartson R., Pyla P. The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann, 2013. 968 p. 41. Mental models in UX [Электронный ресурс] // Diegovz. 5 ноября 2020. URL: https://diegovz.com/en/blog/mental-models-in-ux (дата обращения: 05.11.2022). 42. Nielsen J. Mental Models [Электронный ресурс] // NN/g. October 17, 2010. URL: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/mental-models (дата обращения: 05.11.2022). 43. Sun R. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 768 p. 44. Cognitive Models [Электронный ресурс] // Usability Body of Knowledge. URL: https://www.usabilitybok.org/cognitive-models (дата обращения: 05.11.2022). 45. Ritter F., Baxter G., Young R. User interface evaluation: How cognitive models can help. MA: Addison-Wesley, 2001. P. 125-147. References 1. Spravochnik po UDK [Reference book on UDC]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://teacode.com/online/udc (accessed 05.11.2022). 2. IEC 60447:2004. Basic and safety principles for man-machine interface, marking and identification — Actuating principles. Introduced 2004-01-12, International Standard, 2004, 45 p. 3. Blanchard H. International Standards on Human-Computer Interaction: What is Out There and How Will it be Implemented? Seventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (San Francisco, USA, August 24-29, 1997). San Francisco, Elsevier, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 599-602. 4. ISO/IEC/IEEE 26514:2022. Systems and software engineering — Requirements for designers and developers of user documentation. Introduced 2022-01-14, International Standard, 2022, 64 p. 5. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2017. Systems and software engineering — Vocabulary. Introduced 2017-09-06, International Standard, 2017, 522 p. 6. Cooper A., Reimann R., Cronin D., Noessel C. About Face: The Essentials o f Interaction Design. 4th ed. Wiley, 2014, 720 p. 7. Human-computer interface. A Dictionary of Computing, 2022. Available at: https://www.encyclopedia.com/computing/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/human- computer-interface (accessed 05.11.2022). 8. Wesolko D. Peter Morville’s User Experience Honeycomb. Available at: https://danewesolko.medium.com/peter-morvilles-user-experience-honeycomb-904c383b6886 (accessed 05.11.2022). 9. Shishaev M., Dikovitsky V., Lapochkina L. The experience of building cognitive user interfaces ofmultidomain information systems based on the mental model of users. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2017, vol. 574, pp. 281-290. Труды Кольского научного центра РАН. Серия: Технические науки. 2022. Т. 13, № 2. С. 66-77. Transactions of the Kola Science Centre of RAS. Series: Engineering Sciences. 2022. Vol. 13, No. 2. P. 66-77. © Вицентий А. В., 2022 75