Труды КНЦ вып. 22 (ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ вып. 2/2022(13))

References 1. Ginzburg L. Ya. O dokumental'noj literature i principah postroeniya haraktera [On Documentary Literature and Principles of Character Building]. Voprosy literatury [Questions o f Literature], 1970, no. 7, pp. 62-91. (In Russ.). Available at: https://voplit.ru/article//o-dokumentalnoj-literature-i-printsipah-postroeniya-haraktera/ ^ c e s s e d 25.03.2022). 2. Mestergazi E. G. Hudozhestvennaya slovesnost' i real'nost': dokumental'noe nachalo v otechestvennoj literature X X veka. Avtoreferat diss. d-ra. filolog. nauk [Fiction and Reality: Documentary Origins in Russian Literature o f the 20th Century. Dr. Sci. (Philology) diss. abstract]. Moscow, 2008, 49 p. (In Russ.). 3. Zhenett Zh. Figury [Figures]. Moscow, Sabashnikov Publishing House, 1998, 472 p. (In Russ.). 4. Averincev S. S. Istoricheskaya podvizhnost' kategorii zhanra: opyt periodizacii [Historical mobility of the genre category: the experience o f periodization]. Istoricheskaya poetika. Itogi i perspektivy izucheniya [Historical poetics. Results and prospects of the study]. Moscow, Nauka, 1986, pp. 104-116. (In Russ.). 5. Averincev S. S. Zhanry kak abstrakciya i zhanry kak real'nost': dialektika zamknutosti i razomknutosti [Genres as abstraction and genres as reality: the dialectic o f closedness and openness]. Vzaimosvyaz' i vzaimovliyanie zhanrov v razvitii antichnoj literatury [Relationship and mutual influence o f genres in the development of ancient literature]. Moscow, Nauka, 1989, pp. 3-25. (In Russ.). 6. Lukov V. A. Zhanry i zhanrovye generalizacii [Genres and genre generalizations]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2006, no. 1, pp. 141-148. (In Russ.). 7. Kokkonen T., Koskinen I. Genres as Real Kinds and Projections. Genre — Text — Interpretation Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Folklore and Beyond. Ed. by Kaarina Koski and Frog with Ulla Savolainen. Finnish Literature Society. SKS. Helsinki, Studia fennica folkloristica, 22, 2016, pp. 89-109. 8. Neklyudov S. Yu. Ot sostavitelya [From the compiler]. “Naivnaya literature”: Issledovaniya i teksty [“Naive literature”: Research and texts]. Moscow, Moskovskij obshchestvennyj nauchnyj fond, 2001, pp. 4-21. (In Russ.). Available at: http://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/publications.htm Accessed 21.03.2022). 9. Halezova E. B. Doroga dlinoyu v zhizn' [The road o f a lifetime]. Moscow, Nauka, 2020, 607 p. (In Russ.). 10. Boldyreva E. M. Avtobiografizm i avtobiografiya: samokonstruirovanie i semiotizaciya sub"ekta [Autobiographism and autobiography: self-construction and semiotization of the subject]. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij byulleten' [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 2017, no. 4, pp. 242-251. (In Russ.). 11.Smirnov S. A. Apologiya avtobiografii. Chast' 1. Avtobiografiya: problema metoda [Apologia for autobiography. Part 1. Autobiography: the problem o f the method]. Chelovek.RU [Human.RU], 2018, no. 13, pp. 66-103. (In Russ.). 12.Lotman Yu. M. O modeliruyushchem znachenii ponyatij “konca” i “nachala” v hudozhestvennyh tekstah [On the modeling meaning o f the concepts of “end” and “beginning” in literary texts]. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB, 2000, pp. 427-430. (In Russ.). 13.Hulme P., Youngs T. (eds.) Travel Writing. Cambridge, Cambrigde University Press, 2002, 356 p. (The Cambridge Companion). 47