Север и рынок. 2024, № 1.
РАЗВИТИЕ ОТРАСЛЕЙ ИСЕКТОРОВ ЭКОНОМИКИ НА СЕВЕРЕ И В АРКТИКЕ РОССИИ 4. Bailova N. V., Glinkina I. M., Aleksandrova M. S. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya otrasli molochnogo skotovodstva v Rossii [Status and development prospects of the dairy cattle industry]. Teoriya i praktika innovatsionnykh tekhnologii v APK. Materialy natsional'noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Theory and practice of innovative technologies in agriculture]. Voronezh, 2023, Ch. 2, pp. 5-12. (In Russ.). 5. Kulintsev V. V., Surov A. I., Shevkhuzhev A. F. Myasnoe skotovodstvo Stavropol'skogo kraya [Beef cattle breeding in the Stavropol territory]. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo [Dairy and beef cattle farming], 2022, no. 2, pp. 6-11. (In Russ.). 6. Matyukov V. S., Zharikov Ya. A., Lobov D. V. Sokhranit' kholmogorskuyu porodu — osnovu organicheskogo sel'skogo khozyaistva na Severe [Preserving the Kholmogorsky breed as a foundation of organic agriculture in the North]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Agrarian University], 2019, no. 55, pp. 63-69. (In Russ.). 7. Mateescu Raluca G. Chapter 2 — Genetics and breeding of beef cattle. Animal Agriculture. Sustainability, Challenges and Innovations, 2020, pp. 21-35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00002-1. 8. Wahinya P. K., Jeyaruban M. G., Swan A. A., van der Werf J. H. J. Breeding objectives for dairy cattle under low, medium and high production systems in the tropics. Animal, 2022, vol. 16, is. 5, 100513. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100513. 9. Roche J. R., Berry D. P., Delaby L., Dillon P. G., Horan B., Macdonald K. A., Neal M. Review: New considerations to refine breeding objectives of dairy cows for increasing robustness and sustainability of grass-based milk production systems. Animal, 2018, vol. 12, sup. 2, pp. 350-362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002471. 10. Greyerz K. von, Tidaker P., Karlsson J. O., Roos E. A large share of climate impacts of beef and dairy can be attributed to ecosystem services other than food production. Journal o f Environmental Management, 2023, vol. 325, part A, 116400. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2022.116400. 11. Tamasy C. Areas of intensive livestock agriculture as emerging alternative economic spaces? Applied Geography, 2013, vol. 45, pp. 385-391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.apgeog.2013.02.012. 12. Rowntree J. E., Stanley P. L. , Maciel I. C. F., Thorbecke M., Rosenzweig S. T., Hancock D. W., Guzman A., Raven M. R. Ecosystem impacts and productive capacity of a multi-species pastured livestock system. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2020, vol. 4 (544984), pp. 1-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544984. 13. Scialabba Nadia. E.-H. Managing Healthy Livestock Production and Consumption. Chapter 2 — Livestock food and human nutrition, 2022, pp. 29-44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823019-0.00012-X. 14. Poore J., Nemecek T. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 2018, vol. 360, no. 6392, pp. 987-992. Available at: DOI: https:// 10.1126/science.aaq0216. 15. Springmann M., Godfray H. C. J., Rayner M., Scarborough P. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proceedings o f the National Academy o f Sciences, 2016, vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 4146-4151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523119113. 16. Clark M. A., Springmann M., Hill J., Tilman D. Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proceedings o f the National Academy o f Sciences o f the United States o f America , 2019, vol. 116 (46), pp. 23357-23362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906908116. 17. Eating Better. 2020. What is better meat and dairy? Available at: https://www.eating-better.org/who-we-are/what- is-better-meat-and-dairy/. 18. Schosler H., Boer J. D. Towards more sustainable diets: Insights from the food philosophies of "gourmets" and their relevance for policy strategies. Appetite, 2017-2018, vol. 127, pp. 59-68. Available at: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.022. 19. Matyukov V. S., Zharikov Ya. A., Lobov D. V., Nikolaev S. V. Sostoyanie i perspektivy sokhraneniya genofonda skota kholmogorskoi porody [The state and prospects of preserving the gene pool of cattle of the Kholmogorsky breed]. Ekonomicheskie aspekty upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem agrarnogo sektora Rossii v regional'nykh aspektakh. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii v ramkakh III Respublikanskogo foruma, posvyashchennogo Dnyu Intellektual'noi sobstvennosti "Intellektual'naya sobstvennost' — budushchee Respubliki Komi" [Economic aspects of managing the innovation-driven development of the agricultural sector of Russia: Regional aspects]. Syktyvkar, 2019, pp. 174-187. (In Russ.). 20. Zhao Y., Zhao H., Li L., Tan J., Wang Y., Liu M., Jiang L. Multi-omics analysis reveals that the metabolite profile of raw milk is associated with dairy cows' health status. Food Chemistry, 2023, vol. 428, 136813. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136813. 21. Boer J. D., Aiking H. Considering how farm animal welfare concerns may contribute to more sustainable diets. Appetite, 2022, vol. 168, 105786. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105786. СЕВЕР И РЫНОК: формирование экономического порядка. 2024. № 1. С. 82-92. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2024, no. 1, pp. 82-92. © Мальцева И. С., 2024 91
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTUzNzYz