Север и рынок. 2023, № 1.

СЕВЕР И РЫНОК: формирование экономического порядка. 2023. № 1. С. 7-34. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2023, no. 1, pp. 7-34. К ВОПРОСАМ О ТЕМАТИКАХ НАУЧНЫХ РАБОТ И НАУЧНЫХ ДИСКУРСАХ 72. Martmez-Zarzoso I. The impact of urbanization on CO 2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries / I. Martmez- Zarzoso, A. Maruotti // Ecological Economics. 2011. Т. 70, № 7. С. 1344-1353. 73. Fischer C. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation / C. Fischer, R. G. Newell // Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2008. Т. 55, № 2. С. 142-162. 74. Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses / W. Neil Adger [et al.] // Development and Change. 2001. Т. 32, № 4. С. 681-715. 75. The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management / P. Batary [и др.] // Conservation Biology. 2015. Т. 29, № 4. С. 1006-1016. 76. China's growing CO 2 emissions — A race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains / G. P. Peters [et al.] // Environmental Science and Technology. 2007. Т. 41, № 17. С. 5939-5944. 77. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change / C. L. Weber [et al.] // Energy Policy. 2008. Т. 36, №9. С. 3572-3577. 78. Destek M. A. Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development / M. A. Destek, S. A. Sarkodie // Science of the Total Environment. 2019. Т. 650. С. 2483-2489. 79. Omri A. CO 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: Evidence from simultaneous equations models / A. Omri // Energy Economics. 2013. Т. 40. С. 657-664. 80. Lafferty W. M. Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework / W. M. Lafferty, E. Hovden // Environmental Politics. 2003. Т. 12, № 3. С. 1-22. 81. Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the porter hypothesis / P. Lanoie [et al.] // Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2011. Т. 20, № 3. С. 803-842. 82. Rubashkina Y. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors / Y. Rubashkina, M. Galeotti, E. Verdolini // Energy Policy. 2015. Т. 83. С. 288-300. 83. Druckman A. The carbon footprint of UK households 1990-2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model / A. Druckman, T. Jackson // Ecological Economics. 2009. Т. 68, №7. С. 2066-2077. 84. Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe / J. Malinauskaite [et al.] // Energy. 2017. Т. 141. С. 2013-2044. 85. Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia / M. M. Alam [et al.] // Ecological Indicators. 2016. Т. 70. С. 466-479. 86. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition / G. D. Gann [et al.] // Restoration Ecology. 2019. Т. 27, № S1. С. S1-S46. 87. International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios / L. Clarke [et al.] // Energy Economics. 2009. Т. 31, № SUPPL. 2. С. S64-S81. 88. The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century / O. Fricko [et al.] // Global Environmental Change. 2017. Т. 42. С. 251-267. 89. Burton R. J. F. Exploring farmers' cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes / R. J. F. Burton, C. Kuczera, G. Schwarz // Sociologia Ruralis. 2008. Т. 48, № 1. С. 16-37. 90. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land / V. H. Dale [et al.] // Ecological Applications. 2000. Т. 10, № 3. С. 639-670. 91. GLOBIO3: A framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss / R. Alkemade [et al.] // Ecosystems. 2009. Т. 12, № 3. С. 374-390. 92. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers / V. Rizos [et al.] // Sustainability (Switzerland).2016. Т. 8, № 11. 93. High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO 2 emission fluxes for the United States / K. R. Gurney [et al.] // Environmental Science and Technology. 2009. Т. 43, № 14. С. 5535-5541. 94. Frondel M. End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries / M. Frondel, J. Horbach, K. Rennings // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2007. Т. 16, №8. С. 571-584. 95. Dean J.M. Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China / J. M. Dean, M. E. Lovely, H. Wang // Journal of Development Economics. 2009. Т. 90, № 1. С. 1-13. 96. Popp D. International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NO x and SO 2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany / D. Popp // Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2006. Т. 51, № 1.С. 46-71. 97. The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting / L. H. Goulder [et al.] // Journal of Public Economics. 1999. Т. 72, № 3.С. 329-360. 98. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm / D. P. van Vuuren [et al.] // Global Environmental Change. 2017. Т. 42. С. 237-250. 99. Rehfeld K. Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis / K. Rehfeld, K. Rennings, A. Ziegler // Ecological Economics. 2007. Т. 61, № 1. С. 91-100. 100. Rex E. Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing / E. Rex, H. Baumann // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007. Т. 15, № 6. С. 567-576. ©Дядик В. В. и др., 2023 21