Север и рынок. 2022, № 2.

СЕВЕР И РЫНОК: формирование экономического порядка. 2022. № 2. С. 69-81. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2022, no. 2, pp. 69-81. СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ РЕГИОНАМИ ИАРКТИЧЕСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА Thus, consideration of the effect of policies, scientific views, and internal development factors on the long-standing social and economic processes in Russia's Polar regions has allowed substantiating not only the determining nature of the effect policy has on the processes in the Arctic but also singling out the contemporary feature — expansion of ideas. When discussing the performance of the Russian Arctic, the authors recommend taking into account not only the impact of policy but also that of expansion of ideas, with the latter becoming a factor of influence on social and economic processes, too. Main Findings: - it has been found that national Arctic politics is the determining factor of influencing the socio-economic transformations of Russia's Polar regions, and a new impact factor has been identified - - expansion of ideas that transforms priorities; - the authors have found a positive effect of the modern policy on the development; it has slowed down migration and ensured the growth of investments, but at the same time, risks of migration aggravating in the nearest future have been identified (strong migration sentiments have been revealed), and most intensive disturbances of economic processes are observed (there is no relation between the number of employees and GRP, and in a number of Russia's Polar regions, investments do not ensure the GRP growth. References 1. Bertelsen R. G., Gallucci V. The Return of China, Post-Cold War Russia and the Arctic: Changes on Land and at Sea. Marine Pol. 2016. Vol. 72. P. 240-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.034 2. Healy A. Innovation in Circumpolar Regions: New Challenges for Smart Specialization. The North. Rev. 2017. No. 45. P. 1 1 -3 2 . DOI: 10.22584/nr45.2017.002 3. Flake L E., 2014. Russia's Security Intentions in a Melting Arctic. Military and Strat. Affair. 2014. Vol. 6. P. 99-116. 4. Korchak E. A., Serova N. A., Emelyanova E. E., Yakovchuk A. A. Human capital of the Arctic: problems and development prospects. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. Vol. 302. P. 012078. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012078 5. Markkula I, Turunen M., Rasmus S. A review of climate change impacts on the ecosystem services in the Saami Homeland in Finland. Scien. of The Total Environ. 2019. Vol. 692. P. 1070-1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.272 6. O'Garra T. Economic value of ecosystem services, minerals, and oil in a melting Arctic: A preliminary assessment. Ecosys. Services. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 180-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.024 7. Kudryashova E. V., Zarubina L. A., Sivobrova I. A. Cross-border investment cooperation in the Arctic Region: challenges and opportunities. Econ. and Soc. Changes: Facts, Trends, Forec. 2019. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 39-52. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.2 8. Padrtovaab B., 2019. Frozen narratives: How media present security in the Arctic. Polar Scien. 2019. Vol. 21. P. 37-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2019.05.006 9. Brosnan J. G., Leschine T. M., Miles E. L. Cooperation or Conflict in a Changing Arctic? Ocean Devel. & Intern. Law. 2011. No. 42. P. 173-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2011.543032 10. Heininen L. Arctic strategies and policies: Inventory and comparative study. Akureyri & Rovaniemi: The Northern Research Forum & University of Lapland. 2011. 95 p. 11. Heininen L., Everett K., Padrtova B., Reissell A. Arctic Policies and Strategies-Analysis, Synthesis, and Trends. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria. 2019. 264 p. DOI: 10.22022/AFI/11-2019.16175 12. Konyshev V., Sergunin A. Arctic policies and strategies — analysis, synthesis, and trends, Polar Geography. 2020. Vol. 43, no. 2-3. P. 240-242. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2020.1766593 13. Korchak E., Serova N. High-quality reproduction of labor potential of Arctic territories: migration factor. The Europ. Proc. of Social & Behav. Scien EpSBS. 2019. Vol. LXXVI. P. 1736-1742. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.235 14. Caceres D. 2019. European cooperation: How important country is Poland to ensure the Arctic governance? Polar Scien. Vol. 21. P. 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.10.007 15. Tabata S., Otsuka N., Goto M., Takahashi M., 2021. Economy, society and governance in the Arctic: Overview of ArCS research project in the field of humanities and social sciences (2015-2020). Polar Science. Vol. 27. P. 100600. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2020.100600 16. Skufina T., Baranov S., Samarina V., Larchenko L. The Russian Arctic: Strategic management and socio-economic transformation. Acad. of Strateg. Manag. Journ. 2021. Vol. 21, no. 5. P. 1-8. 17. Vinogradova V., Titkova T., Zolotokrylin A. How climate change is affecting the transitional natural zones of the Northern and Arctic regions of Russia. Polar Science. 2021. Vol. 29. P. 100652. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2021.100652 18. Samarina V. P., Skufina T. P., Savon D. Y., Shinkevich A. I. Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone. Sustainabil. 2021. Vol. 13, no. 14. P. 7749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147749 © Скуфьина Т. П., Баранов С. В., Самарина В. П., Самарин А. В., 2022 79