Север и рынок. 2018, № 5.

References 1. Leeson D., Mac Dowell N., Shah N., Petit C., Fennell P. S. A Techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high purity sources . International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2017, No. 61, рр. 71-84. 2. Thomas D. C., Benson S. M. Natural CO 2 fields as analogs for geologic CO 2 storage. Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations-Results from the CO 2 Capture Project: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and Verification . 2015, Vol. 2, pp. 687. 3. Yoo B. Y. The development and comparison of CO 2 BOG re-liquefaction processes for LNG fueled CO 2 carriers. Energy . 2017, No. 127, рр. 186-197. 4. Cherepovitsyn A. E., Sidorova K. I., Smirnova N. V. Celesoobraznost' primeneniya tekhnologij sekvestracii CO 2 v Rossii [The feasibility of CO 2 sequestration technologies in Russia]. Neftegazovoe delo: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal [Oil and gas business: electronic scientific journal], 2013, No. (5), рр. 459­ 473 (In Russ.). 5. Ringrose P. CO 2 Capture and Storage-Developing industrial-scale CCS projects in Norway. In 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 2016-Workshops. 6. Godec M., Koperna G., Gale J. CO 2 -ECBM: a review of its status and global potential. Energy Procedia, 2014, No. 63, рр. 5858-5869. 7. Wang Q., Zhang D., Wang H., Jiang W., Wu X., Yang J., Huo P. Influence of CO 2 exposure on high- pressure methane and CO 2 adsorption on various rank coals: implications for CO 2 sequestration in coal seams. Energy & Fuels, 2015, No. 29 (6), рр. 3785-3795. 8. Tcvetkov P.; Cherepovitsyn A. Prospects of CCS Projects Implementation in Russia: Environmental Protection and Economic Opportunities. J. Ecol. Eng . 2016, No. 17 (2), рр. 24-32. 9. Otmas A. A. The Oil Recovery Factors and the Dynamics of Their Changes in Various Petroleum Complexes in Nenets Autonomous District. Oil and Gas Geology. Theory and Practice . 2014, No. 9 (2). 10. Amirian E., Dejam M., Chen Z. Performance forecasting for polymer flooding in heavy oil reservoirs. Fuel . 2018, No. 216, рр. 83-100. 11. Dooley J. J. et al. CO 2 -driven Enhanced Oil Recovery as a Stepping Stone to What? Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2010. 12. Surguchev M. L. Secondary and Tertiary Methods to Enhance Oil Recovery. Moscow, Nedra, 2010. 13. Wallace M., Kuuskraa V. Near-Term Projections of CO 2 Utilization for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy Sector Planning and Analysis (ESPA) for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). 2014. 14. Ibatullin R. R. Technological Processes of Oil-Field Development: study guide. 2010. 15. Privalov N., Privalova S. Problems of mineral tax computation in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Mining Institute . 2017, No. 224 (2), рр. 255-262. 16. Li Q., Liu G. Risk assessment of the geological storage of CO 2 : A review. Geologic carbon sequestration: Understanding reservoir behavior, USA, 2016, pp. 249-284. 17. Ganjdanesh R., Pope G. A., Sepehrnoori K. Production of energy from saline aquifers: a method to offset the energy cost of carbon capture and storage. Int. J. GHG Control . 2015, No. 34, рр. 97-105. 18. Perez-Fortes M. et al. Methanol synthesis using captured CO 2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment. Applied Energy . 2015. 19. Foroozesh J., Jamiolahmady M., Sohrabi M. Mathematical modeling of carbonated water injection for EOR and CO 2 storage with a focus on mass transfer kinetics. Fuel . 2016, No. 174, рр. 325-332. 20. Huaman R. N. E., Jun T. X. Energy related CO 2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews . 2014, No. 31, рр. 368-385. 21. Chen Z. A., Li Q., Liu L. C., Zhang X., Kuang L., Jia L., Liu G. A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China. Applied Energy . 2015, No. 158, рр. 366-377. 22. Dutschke E., Schumann D., Pietzner K., Wohlfarth K., Holler S. Does it make a difference to the public where CO 2 comes from and where it is stored? An experimental approach to enhance understanding of CCS perceptions. Energy Procedia , 2014, No. 63, рр. 6999-7010. 23. Sara J., Stikkelman R. M., Herder P. M. Assessing relative importance and mutual influence of barriers for CCS deployment of the ROAD project using AHP and DEMATEL methods. Int. J. GHG Control . 2015, No. 41, рр. 336-357. 70