Север и рынок. 2013, N 3.

second, realization o f targeted temporary migration, which can be provided with combined state and business working guest programs, with combining o f microprograms with labor agreements on the base of single target. This aim can be realized on the base o f the contract system, established with a carefully selected subcontractors; third, determination of guidelines, which can help to overcome the cumulative continuous character o f the temporary migration and its gradual changing into the permanent one. In connection with this, they develop contractual mechanisms, which provide for increase o f responsibility o f entrepreneurs and agents. From the other side, they use the long-term experience o f the countries, which have always had a target for labor migration, and for dozens o f years these countries have benn implementing different programs, stimulating migrants come-back and facilitation o f their reintegration into their home-countries economy. The state programs for support of migrants come-back are the combination of various measures, among them: payment of travel expenses for come-back, one-time monetary allowance for adaption in the home-country, subsidy assistance in starting o f a small-scale business, and professional training. Some programs highlights the support for the repatriation o f migrants with the assistance in the home-country economic development [2]. The aim o f the migration policy, directed at in-migrants attraction and based upon careful selection, is the immigration structuring and advancing o f mechanisms o f selection and encouragement o f integration. Russia has the same objectives, as most immigration countries. The immigrants’ integration policy is to involve them into the full-scale social and economic participation in all spheres o f social life. Russia must consider both positive and negative results o f long-time experience o f most immigration countries, when developing integration programs. The key feature o f such programs is their orientation towards different migrants’ groups. Integration o f a specialist differs from integration o f an immigrant, who has no special skills and familiarity with a language. If the first one needs affordable housing, job placement, small-scale business establishment, then apart from these the second also has problems with language, professional training, and sometimes also with the very means for living. The important pre-requirement for the successful adaptation and further integration is access o f the immigrants to the labor market. The most programs, performed at the countries, which are the traditional target for immigration, are directed at the professional training o f immigrants to facilitate their free access to the labor market. We know such programs in Germany, Sweden, France, Spain, Norway, Finland, and recently in Switzerland. At the same time these programs can be implemented into the general policy, which has the universal character, as it has been done in Netherlands [2]. For development and coordination o f the integration policy a special body or a commission can be established. Such bodies have been created and operate now in some countries. For example, in Great Britain they established the Commission for Racial Equality, aimed to tackle racial and ethnic discrimination in the country; in Spain there is the Superior Council For Regulation and Coordination o f Foreign Residents' Affairs and Immigration (Plan Greco), aimed at coordination o f efforts o f governments o f three levels on immigration policy development, which policy is to include issues o f social integration and employment; and also the Forum on Integration, which is the consultative body, developing recommendation for government on foreigners integration affairs. For successful integration the complex and coordinated measures are needed, which are aimed at strengthening the ties between all actors, that is between migrants, government, education system, state employment services, forms and associations, non-governmental organizations. At this the enhanced coordination between different levels o f the authorities (that is, local, regional and national levels) is the most important factor for increase o f their efforts efficiency [2]. One o f the most significant elements o f the migration strategy o f Russia is the support for compatriots abroad and creation o f friendly environment for their voluntary come-back. It is obvious, that the new paradigm o f the migration policy is less advantageous for returning compatriots [6] as they have no right to choose the place o f living and the well-paid job. The only motivating reason for them is the very return to their home-country and provision of new future for their children. So we must provide some unequalled benefits, otherwise the claimed policy remains only a claim. At the same time it may result in social strain in the country. To soften the conflict it is required to connect the migration policy with that part of the social and economic policy, which is targeted at preservation of natural and territorial potential o f the country. The preferences for coming migrants must be followed with material allowances, benefits, and loans, provided for the local population; the state policy must also create favorable labor conditions, business and investment environment; establishment o f the modern infrastructure, accessible both for repatriates and the local residents. Because if we want to increase the population o f some certain regions, we have to create seeable economic advantages [2]. Development o f the modern Russian policy on migration has to take into account the original countries’ interests and strong influence o f the international migration processes factors. The strategy, which 75