Арктика 2035: актуальные вопросы, проблемы, решения. 2021, №2.

Literature 1. ru.qaz.wiki >Science diplomacy 2. A lesson in science diplomacy. Discussion brings foundations closer together// Poisk Weekly Newspaper o f the Scientific Communities, 2016, no. 9. 3. Lee B. Managing the interlocking climate and resource challenges// International Affairs. Blackwell: Oxford, 2009, Vol. 85, No 6. 4. Panchenko V. Y., Torkunov A. V. Scientist as diplomat: science influences the solution o f international conflicts and problems. / / Bulletin o f the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. 2018. №1 (97). P. 10-17. 5. Kiselev V., Nechaeva E. A New Change in Science Diplomacy. / / RIAC Analytical Articles. Electronic resource URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/ analytics/novoe-izmerenie-nauchnoy-diplomatii/. Date o f accession 12.01.2021. 6. There w ill be a revolution in scientific management o f society. Electronic resource URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4501983?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex. com&utm_campaign=dbr 7. Fokin Y. E., Smirnov A. I. Kirkenes Declaration on Cooperation in the Barents Euro- A rctic Region: a V iew from Russia 20 Years Later. / / М. 2012. 88 p. 8. Romanova M. D. Science diplomacy: measurement and practices. / / Science. Innovations. Education. 2017. Т. 12. № 1. P. 38-52. 9. Krynzhina M. D. Scientific diplomacy as interpreted by academic specialists. // International Processes. 2018. Т. 16. № 4 (55). P. 193-208 10. Simonyan R. Kh. Prospects for the development o f A rctic cooperation between Russia and the EU (by the example o f the Kolarctic 2014-2020 program). / / Bulletin o f the Institute o f Economics o f the Russian Academy o f Sciences No. 1. 2021. P. 125-140. DOI: 10.24412/2073­ 6487-2021-1-125-140. 11. Pashkovskaya I. G. The European Union: Assisting Russia's Development Through TACIS and Democratization and Human Rights Programs and Humanitarian Aid. Analytical Report o f MG IMO (U) o f MFA o f Russia, Issue 8 (13), O ctober 2006, 76 p. 12. Baklanov A. A., Borovichev E. A., Denisov D. B., Evdokimova G. A., Isaeva L. G., Lukin A. A., Lukina N. V., Kalabin G. V., Korneikova M. V., Makarov D. V., Masloboev V. A., Moiseenko T. I., Fokina N. V. INEP KSC RAS: 30 years - the flight is normal. Collection o f materials for the anniversary o f the Institute// Apatity: FRC KSC RAS, 2019. 208 p. 13. AMAP, 2017. Adaptation Actions for a Changing Arctic: Perspectives from the Barents Area. A rctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP), Oslo, Norway, xiv + 267pp 14. Fennoscandia Green Belt Strategy 2020. Electronic resource: http://www.ym.fi/en- US/International_cooperation/Green_Belt_of_Fennoscandia 15. Conservation o f valuable natural areas o f north-western Russia. The analysis o f the representation o f the specially protected natural areas network in the Arkhangelsk, Vologda, Leningrad, and Murmansk Regions, the Republic o f Karelia, Saint-Petersburg K. N. Kobyakova (ed.) St. Petersburg. 2011. 506 p. 16. Diversity o f plants, lichens, and Cyanoprokaryota in the Murmansk Region: study results and prospects o f protection. St. Petersburg: Severo-zapadnyi pechatnyi dvor. 2009. 120 p. 17. Klyuchnikova E. M., Titov A. F., Masloboev V. A., Petrov V. N. Green Belt o f Fennoscandia as a factor o f socio-economic development o f border territories / / Proceedings o f Karelian Research Centre. 2019. №4. P. 144-153. 6 4 | А Р К Т И К А —2035: актуальные вопросы, проблемы, решения | 2021- № 2 | 6 |