Разумова И. А. Документальная литература ученых-геологов. (О дискурсивных аспектах профессии) // Ученые записки Петрозаводского государственного университета. – 2022. – Т. 44, № 6. – С. 91-98.

98 И. А. Разумова perspective, it is important that these works reveal both stable and varying cultural models of geologists. K e y w o r d s : factual literature, anthropology of professions, anthropology of science, geologists, biographical chronicle, autobiographical story A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s . The study was funded from the federal budget as part of the state project FMEZ-2022- 0028 assigned to the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. F o r c i t a t i o n : Razumova, I. A. Documentary literature written by earth scientists (Discursive aspects of the profession). Proceedings o f Petrozavodsk State University. 2022;44(6):91-98. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2022.802 REFERENCES 1. A v e r i n t s e v , S. S. Genre as abstraction and genres as reality: the dialectic of closure and openness. Rela­ tionship and mutual influence o f genres in the development o f ancient literature. Moscow, 1989. P. 3-25. (In Russ.) 2. Anthropology of academic life: traditions and innovations. Moscow, 2013. 376 p. (In Russ.) 3. Anthropology of professions, or unauthorized entry is allowed. Moscow, 2011. 356 p. (In Russ.) 4. B a i b u r i n , A . K . Notes on the formation of an official biography in Russian tradition. Text and History. 2021;2:140-154. DOI: 10.31860/2712-7591-2021-2-140-154 (In Russ.) 5. B o l d y r e v a , E . M . Autobiographism and autobiography: self-constructing and subject semiotization. Yaro­ slavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2017,4:242-251. (In Russ.) 6. G e n e t t e , G. Figures: Works on poetics. Moscow, 1998. 472 p. (In Russ.) 7. Z m e e v a , O. V. The field season of geologists and practice of mobility: on the history of mineralogical re­ search of Khibiny tundra. Proceedings o f Petrozavodsk State University. 2018;5(174):91-96. (In Russ.) 8. L u k o v , V. A. Genres and genre generalizations. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2006;1:141-148. (In Russ.) 9. M e s t e r g a z i , E . G . Documentary principle in the literature of the twentieth century. Moscow, 2006. 160 p. (In Russ.) 10. “Naive literature”: studies and texts. (S. Yu. Nekludov, Comp.). Moscow, 2001. 246 p. (In Russ.) 11. N e k l y u d o v , S. Yu . Themes and variations. Moscow, 2016. 520 p. (In Russ.) 12. P a v l o v a , S . Y u . On the correlation of the concepts of “autobiography genre”, “autobiographical discourse”, “autobiographism”: literary aspect. Speech Genres. 2020;1(25):22-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740- 2020-1-25-22-28 (In Russ.) 13. P o p o v a , T. N. Biography of a historian at the crossroads of historiographical traditions. Theory. Methodology. Practice. Odessa, 2017. 456 p. (In Russ.) 14. R o m a n o v , P. V. , Y а r s k a y a - S m i r n o v a , E. R. Anthropological studies of professions. Anthropology o f professions: Collection o f research papers. Saratov, 2005. Р. 13-49. (In Russ.) 15. S i l a n t ’e v , I. V. Plot studies. Mosoow, 2009. 223 p. (In Russ.) 16. J o n n e s , D . The Matrix of narrative: Family systems and the semiotics of story. Berlin; New York; Mouton de Gruyter, 1990. 293 р. 17. K o k k o n e n , T. , K o s k i n e n , I. Genres as real kinds and projections. Genre - text - interpretation: Multi­ disciplinary perspectives on folklore and beyond. (K. Koski, Frog, U. Savolainen, Eds.). Helsinki, 2016. P. 89-109. Received: 27 June, 2022; accepted: 22 August, 2022

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTUzNzYz