Разумова И. А. Книга Р. А. Кравченко-Бережного как исторический источник и авторский текст // Ученые записки Петрозаводского государственного университета. – 2020. – Т. 42, № 6.

Книга Р. А. Кравченко-Бережного «Между белым и красным» как исторический источник и авторский текст 39 Keywords: historical source, diary, memoirs, Great Patriotic War, occupation, R. A. Kravchenko-Berezhnoy * The study was conducted as part of the state project No 0226-2019-0066 “Sociocultural and scientific-technical development of the northwestern part of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation in the XIX and the XX centuries: historical and anthropological perspectives”. C i t e t h i s a r t i c l e a s : Razumova I. A. Kravchenko-Berezhnoy’s book Between the White and the Red as a historical source and an author’s text. Proceedings o f Petrozavodsk State University. 2020. Vol. 42. No 6. P. 32-39. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2020.514 REFERENCES 1. A u s t M . , V u l p i u s R . , M i l l e r А . Foreword. The role of transfers in shaping the image and function ing of the Russian Empire (1700-1917). Imperium inter pares: The role o f transfers in the history o f the Russian Empire (1700-1917). (M. Aust, R. Vulpius, & A. Miller, Eds.). Mostow, 2010. P. 5-13. (In Russ.) 2. B o r o v i k o v a M. V. , G u z a i r o v T. T. , L e i b o v R. G . , S m o z h e v s k i k h - S m i r n o - v a M . A. , F r a i m a n I . D. , F r a i m a n T. N. Russian memoirs in historical and typological coverage: the statement of the problem. “Continuous chain o f a story”: Collection o f articles in memory o f A. G. Tartakovs- kiy. (V. A. Milchina, A. L. Yurganov, Comp.). Moscow, 2004. P. 346-361. Available at: https://imwerden.de/pdf/ tsep_nepreryvnogo_predaniya_sbornik_pamyati_tartakovskogo_2004__ocr.pdf (accessed 12.02.2020). (In Russ.) 3. G a l i u l l i n a D. M. On the problem of studying memoir in Russian historical science. Proceedings o fKazan University. 2006. Vol. 148. Book 4. P. 36-45. (In Russ.) 4. G e o r g i e v a N. G. Memoirs as cultural phenomenon and historical source. RUDN Journal o fRussian Histo ry. 2012. No 1. P. 126-138. (In Russ.) 5. G e o r g i e v a N. G. Classification and multifunctionality of historical sources. RUDN Journal o f Russian History. 2016. No 1. P. 7-19. (In Russ.) 6. I v a n o v a N . N . Typology and internal divisions classification of memories, diaries and letters: problems of source study methodology. RUDN Journal o f Russian History. 2006. No 3 (7). P. 105-110. (In Russ.) 7. K r a v c h e n k o - B e r e z h n o y R. A . Between the white and the red: Freeze frames of my XX century. St. Petersburg, 2008. 423 p. (In Russ.) 8. L a p p o M . Typology of memoirs and autobiographical publications: dynamic aspects. Bibliosfera. 2015. No 2. P. 47-52. (In Russ.) 9. N o r a P. Problems of places of memory. France-memory. (P. Nora, M. Ozuf, J. de Puymezh, M. Vinok). St. Pe tersburg, 1999. P. 17-50. (In Russ.) 10. P a s h k o v s k a y a T. G. Heuristic potential of memoirs in historical research. Historical, Philosophical, Po litical and Legal Sciences, Culturology and Art History. Theoretical and Practical Issues. No 7 (69). Part 1. Tam bov, 2016. P. 110-112. (In Russ.) 11. R e p i n a L . P. Events and images of the past in historical and cultural memory. The New Past. 2016. No 1. P. 82-99. (In Russ.) 12. S a f r o n o v a Yu . A. The third wave of memory studies: Going against the grain for twenty-three years. Po litical Science (RU). Moscow, 2018. No 3. P. 12-31. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31249/poln/2018.03.01 13. S u r z h i k o v a N. V. Ego-documents: intellectual fashion or conscious need? (Instead of a foreword). History in ego-documents: Research and sources. (N. V. Surzhikova, Ed.). Ekaterinburg, 2014. P. 6-13. (In Russ.) 14. F i l a t o v a N. M. Approaches to the study of ego-documents in modern historical science in the light of the “linguistic turn”. Documents and the “documentary” in Slavic cultures: between authentic and imaginary: Collection o f articles. (N. M. Kurennaya, Ed.). Moscow, 2018. P. 24-40. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31168/0402-2.2 15. S h e r e t o v S . G . Problems of memoir sources classification in the Soviet historiography of source studies. Vestnik o f Kaynar University. 2002. No 2. Available at: https://www.studmed.ru/view/sheretov-sg-problemy- klassifikacii-m em uarnyh -istochnikov -v -sovetskoy -istoriografii82-94 istochnikoveden iya_867bcdba999 . html?page=2 (accessed 12.02.2020). (In Russ.) 16. D e k k e r R . Jacques Presser’s heritage: Egodocuments in the study of history. M emoriay Civilization (MyC). 2002. No 5. P. 13-37. Available at: http://www.egodocument.net/publicaties.html (accessed 12.02.2020). (In Russ.) 17. G e n s b u r g e r S. Halbwachs’ studies in collective memory: A founding text for contemporary «memory stud ies»? Journal o f Classical Sociology. L., 2016. Vol. 16. No 4. P. 396-413. DOI: 10.1177/1468795X16656268 18. K a n s t e i n e r W. Finding meaning in memory: a methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Memory. 2002. Vol. 41. No 2. P. 179-197. DOI: 10.1111 /0018-2656.00198 19. M a s c u h M . , D e k k e r P. & B a g g e r m a n A. Ego-documents and history: A short account of the longue duree. The Historian. 2016. Vol. 78. No 1. P. 11-56. DOI: 10.1111/hisn.12080 20. O l i c k J . , S i e r A . & W u e s t e n b e r g J . The memory studies association: Ambitions and an invitation. Memory Studies. L., 2017. Vol. 10. No 4. P. 490-494. DOI: 10.1177/1750698017721792 21. P a s s e r i n i L. & G e p p e r t A. Historians in flux: The concept, task and challenge of ego-historie. His- torein. 2002. No 3. P. 7-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.96file:///C:/Users/РИА/Downloads/ Historians_in_Flux_The_Concept_Task_and_Challenge_.pdf (accessed 12.02.2020). 22. V o n G r e y e r z K. Ego-documents: The last word? German History. 2010. Vol. 28. No 3. P. 273-282. DOI: 10.1093/gerhis/ghq064 Received: 28 February, 2020