Разумова И. А. О динамике социальных границ: власть в воспоминаниях подневольных тружеников // Ученые записки Петрозаводского государственного университета. – 2021. – Т. 43, № 2.

114 И. А. Разумова of the results of the activities of Soviet power in the country, and evaluation of the quality of life of the diarist at the moment, as well as ethnic and other social identifiers of the subject of discourse. The configurations of relations between the authorities and the supervised people consisted of routine interactions and various events when the life and health of the displaced persons depended on the personal choice and behavior of the authorities. The social status scale of relations is adjusted by traditional ethical views. The specifics of the power structure under the frontier conditions, the high popular reputation of individual local authorities’ representatives, the reduction of social distance, the adjustment of goals and values in the process of work on the development of a new territory, as well as interpersonal mutual assistance contributed to a balance of relations between the authorities and the subordinate forced workers. K e y w o r d s : power, authorities, special settlers, social dynamics, frontier, Kola Peninsula A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s . The study was carried out as part of the state project No 0226-2019-0066. F o r c i t a t i o n : Razumova, I. A. The dynamics of social boundaries: power in the memories of forced laborers. Proceedings o f Petrozavodsk State University. 2021;43(2):106-114. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2021.591 REFERENCES 1. B a s a l a e v a , I. P. Criteria for frontier: statement of the problem. Theory and Practice o f Social Development. 2012;2:46-49. (In Russ.) 2. B r u b a k e r , R. Ethnicity without groups. Mosoow, 2012. 408 p. (In Russ.) 3. V i o l a , L . Peasant GULAG: the world of Stalin’s special settlements. Mosoow, 2010. 335 p. (In Russ.) 4. Power. Politics. State and public service. Analytical index dictionary (V. F. Khalipov et al., Eds.). Moscow, 2017. 384 p. (In Russ.) 5. I g n a t o v a , N. M. Social and spiritual protest of special settlers between the 1930s and the 1950s in the European North: problem statement and interpretation. Available at: https://ist-konkurs.ru/raboty/2005/911-sotsi- alnyj-i-dukhovnyj-protest-spetspereselentsev-v-1930-50-e-gg-na-evropejskom-severe-postanovka-problem-i-inter- pretatsiya (accessed 18.09.2020). (In Russ.) 6. How do we study frontiers today? Discussion on the article by D. V. Sen’. Petersburg Slavic and Balkan Studies/ Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2020;1(27):81—105. DOI: 10.21638/spbu19.2020.105 (In Russ.) 7. K e d r o v , N. G. Bast shoes of Stalinism. Political consciousness of the peasantry of the Russian North in the 1930s. Mosoow, 2013. 280 p. (In Russ.) 8. K i s e l e v , A. A . Vasiliy Ivanovich Kondrikov. Not ju s t a name - the country’s biography: Book one. Mur mansk, 1987. P. 79-92. (In Russ.) 9. K i s e l e v , A . A . Characterizing the image and typical features of the tundra conqueror of the 1930s (Vasiliy Kondrikov). Living in the North: challenging the extreme environment: Collection o f articles. Murmansk, 2005. P. 76-81. (In Russ.) 10. K u d y u k i n a , M. M. Peasantry and power in the 1920s. Digital library “Civil Society in Russia”. Available at: http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Kudyukina.pdf (accessed 18.09.2020). (In Russ.) 11. N e m i r o v s k a y a , A . , F o a , R. Socio-cultural features of the Russian frontier. Sociological Research. 2013;4:80-88. (In Russ.) 12. R a z u m n i y , A. Mikhail Mikhailovich Tsarevsky. Notju s t a name - the country’s biography: Book one. Mur mansk, 1987. P. 141-150. (In Russ.) 13. R a z u m o v a , I . A . Creation and reconstruction of community: the case of special settlers. Proceedings o f Petrozavodsk State University. 2019;8(185):102-110. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2019.419 (In Russ.) 14. R i t z e r , G . Contemporary sociological theories. St. Petersburg, 2002. 688 p. (In Russ.) 15. R u t k e v i c h , A. M. Historical sociology of Norbert Elias. Elias N. The civilizing process. Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Vol. 2. Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2001. P. 349-374. (In Russ.) 16. F i t z p a t r i c k , S . Stalin’s peasants. Social history of Soviet Russia in the 1930s: the village. Moscow, 2001. 422 p. (In Russ.) 17. H u n t i n g t o n , S. Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity. Moscow, 2004. 635 p. (In Russ.) 18. Holocaust and Gulag: what remains after memory? Gefter. 18.01.2016. Available at: http://gefter.ru/archive/17231 (accessed 20.10.2020). (In Russ.) 19. E l i a s , N. The society of individuals = Die Gesellschaft der Individuen. Moscow, 2001. 331 p. (In Russ.) 20. E l i a s , N. The concept of figuration. The Journal o f Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2000;III(3):62-65. (In Russ.) 21. E r i k s o n , E. Identity: youth and crisis. Mosoow, 1996. 344 p. (In Russ.) 22. B a u m a n , Z . Identity. Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge; Malden, 2004. 104 p. 23. C h a r n y , I s r a e l W. ( E d . ) , A d a l i a n , R o u b e n P a u l , J a c o b s , S t e v e n L . , M a r k u s e n , E r i c , S h e r m a n , M a r c I. Encyclopedia of Henocide. Vol. 1. A-H. ABC-CLIO, 1999. 718 p. 24. H o b s b a w m , E . Are all tongues equal? Language, culture, and national identity. Living as equals. (Paul Barker, Ed.). Oxford, 1997. P. 85-98. 25. K a z n e l s o n , M. Remembering the Soviet state: Kulak children and dekulakisation. EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES. Routledge. 2007;59(7):1163-1177. 26. M a r c u s e , H. Holocaust memorials: The emergence of a genre. The American Historical Review. University of Chicago Press, 2010. Vol. 115. P. 5-89. Received: 28 December, 2020; accepted: 29 January, 2021