Korelsky, V. F. Fish, fishermen and fish industry in Russia / V. F. Korelsky. - Bremen : Krebs, [1993?]-.

scales, tables of rates, current rates and wage categories. A justified part of the wages is supplemented by a considerable sum of money paid for the extended gross output, the output of unnecessary goods, for operations not performed, for imaginary high quality, for unjustified rise in prices. The underpay to people of some professions is multiplied by generous remuneration of workers of other professions. The country does not control the situation concerning a right ratio of the demand for money and its support by goods. A real situation is such that a considerable p a rt of incomes for the current (and former) labor are depreciated by its own results. In spite of repeated rises in prices, the people have milliards of roubles which they cannot sensibly spend. This disbalance constantly grows, in the main at the expense of payment for the output of production, which cannot be consumed. The following principal question must be considered from the point of view of a correct regulation of the wage fund (especially, at the level of the national economy): What is the upper limit of the wage scale? In general, this question can be formulated as follows: What is the natural limit of all current outcomes of the population (wage, bonus, additional payments, pensions, stipends, reliefs) at a given time moment? Let us consider this question in the general form. The traditional answer comes from the relationship between the labor input and the payment for it, and if we take industrial production, from the cost of the gross output, marketable products and net output per production workers. In construction, transport, agriculture, and trade, the approach is the same in principle, but with due account of the specificity of the branch. The general answer is: The rise of labor productivity must exceed the rise of payment for it. This answer is correct, but for the present-day state of our economy the limit to the rise of payment is not the rate of increase in labor productivity but in the increase of goods one can buy for his money. In the national economy with an optimal ratio of industries producing means of production and consumer goods, the income cannot grow faster than labor productivity. For our national economy with its hypertrophied development of divisions I and П1, the orientation of rates of increase of the remuneration of labor on the rates of increase on the cost of output has become incorrect The economic meaning of the first left-hand fraction jn inequality (1) given below is the T92 level of labor production for 1992, i.e., the output of one average worker from the list of the personnel. The Q 92 is the volume of the marketable, realized, or actual net production, the Г 92 is the average annual number of workers (without workers from subsidiary farms, football players, firemen, etc.). The second fraction on the left-hand side means the same for 1991. The division of the first fraction by the second gives the rate of growth (the increment) of labor productivity for 1992: 7 3