Korelsky, V. F. Fish, fishermen and fish industry in Russia / V. F. Korelsky. - Bremen : Krebs, [1993?]-.

does not give reason to speak unambiguously in its favor, and, in addition, it has not been widely practiced in the world. The development of small private property on the basis of labor input must be encouraged in the spheres of production of fish goods where the functioning of large state enterprises and organizations is economically inexpedient and, sometimes, even impossible. Small enterprises are not always private. The simultaneous functioning of large, medium, and small state enterprises serves to a greater extent the purpose of demonopolization of the fish industry. New forms of property cannot be inculcated only on the basis of privatization and squandering of the state property. We must create conditions for their development alongside the state property, and not instead of it, on the basis of the accumulation of the means of the working people and the integration of small fisheries. The privatization of small enterprises, the selling of a part of the property of state enterprises to some other owners must be carried out, as a rule, according to the wish of the personnel. A restricted privatization of the property consisting in buying out the property is most advisable. But it must be connected with the paying capacity of the workers. Haste, working by spurts and spontaneity, are inadmissible in the process of denationalization of the state property. It must be taken into account that the advantages of a certain form of property can only be realized under definite conditions. The planned transformation must always correspond to the social and political situation in the country. The process of denationalization of property requires strict estimation of the economic and political consequences of the solution of the problem of property, not only for the means of production, but also for the nonreproducible conditions and factors of the industry, such as the traveling fish supplies of the naval economic zone and of the inland waters of Russia. In the interests of the present and the future generations, the right of property in these resources must remain federal. The development of diversified economy presupposes the creation of flexible mechanisms of legal regulation of the processes of transformation of enterprises based on one form of property into enterprises with some other form of property and, when necessary, a return to the original structures. It should be pointed out that the development and acceptance of legislative acts are impossible without the accumulation of the necessary experience. In particular, in the fish industry of the USSR, the viability of different formations connected with different forms of property was thoroughly verified. Different associations, concerns, research institutions, organizations and enterprises function simultaneously in the fish industry, and, alongside them, rental enterprises, joint-stock companies, with the personnel as shareholders, cooperatives with the right for repayment of circulating assets, small enterprises are being developed. However, the establishment of small enterprises as forms of denationalization and the separation of enterprises from the structure of large organizations sometimes acquire the character of transition to a privileged mode of functioning. In that case, the technological processes are broken up, since small enterprises become independent and, sometimes, do not meet their obligations, because of the profits 6 7