Korelsky, V. F. Fish, fishermen and fish industry in Russia / V. F. Korelsky. - Bremen : Krebs, [1993?]-.

demands made on the choice of the administrator and the number of personnel of the management apparatus. There is no place for egalitarianism here. Neither, the minimum principle is suitable here for determining the number of “headquarters” personnel for all its attractiveness and external effectiveness. The level of variability of the environment, as a whole, for an association is estimated according to the maximum level of the constituent enterprises. Here, we observe an inverse relationship, i.e., the higher the variability, the “deeper” the decentralization of system of management Every economically substantiated enterprise has its own economic zone. For some enterprises these zones may intersect, and a fair or unfair competition may arise. A situation of this kind can be observed, in particular, in the “Sevryba” Industrial Association for fishing fleets. It is understood as an unresolvable contradiction between the Ashing fleets, although in the whole world this contradiction is successfully resolved (is not removed since it is immanent) by following the “rules of the game” in fixing and realization of quotas. Note that it is not so easy to separate zones of efficient production management Its solution by the power of the center alone, without the use of economic methods and raising the culture of management is out of the question. The coordination of economic interests of the subjects of management is needed. The correct approach is to seat them at the round table and give them the possibility of attaining mutually profitable agreements. The transition to the planned market, commodity-and-money relations is inevitably connected with competitions. The enterprising administrator is of no use here. The formation of new structural forms often encounters difficulties connected with a low culture of administration, ignorance of the relationships that arise between the enterprises which passed to the cost accounting. Some enterprises that have become economically independent understand their freedom peculiarly, as the freedom from the fulfillment of obligations for which they were established and supplied with necessary means, which fact is written in the charter. To solve the common problems and to coordinate their efforts, they will evidently take the way of voluntary establishment of associations, corporations which will have the control functions now fulfilled by the Center. Since a self-sustained enterprise possesses means of production and is in charge of them, uses them as their owner, i.e., possesses the rights of the collective owner, it must carry out the activity for which it was established. The only exception is made for enterprises subject to conversion. To solve the problems of its social and economic development, the enterprise must take into account the interests and possibilities of the partner. All the efforts of the enterprise must be directed, first of all, at raising the efficiency of the production process in the framework of its activity, using mainly the economic methods. It itself must decide whether it must become a part of an association. And what must be the main occupation of the enterprise is for the society to decide. An enterprise may essentially diversify its activities, but must not forget the purpose for which it was established. This is one of the peculiarities of the mechanism of the multilevel economic realization of property when the rights to property are separated from the right to own it, dispose of it, and use it. 4 0